I stopped collecting and analyzing global warming data when I realized that the data was being ideologically distorted. It has been a while since I began ignoring the data. I have since been viewing the supporters of global warming as pathetic people controlled by hysteria. Despite the fact that these sad people are often my friends and family members.
I am now in a worse position because it is no longer a matter of defective data manipulated by Lefty perverts. It is now a case of pure blindness.
In all science, there is always the possibility of a pure case experiment. The pure case experiment is a situation where the data cannot be manipulated, where the data has only one explanation and where the data explains the entire phenomenon.
Such is the case with the data at the bottom of this blog. The cumulative snowfall in the Sierra Mountains for over 130 years is recorded for one number each year. The cumulative total for the period is recorded and the annual variance is shown on the chart in standard deviations.
The perfect climate character of this data comes from the fact that the atmosphere that drops the snow has moved for 10 days over the Pacific ocean collecting water and moved one-half day later to drop the water in the mountains. When the temperature is close to freezing the cloud water becomes snow. The cumulative snow pack is what is measured in this chart. Being cumulative eliminates daily and monthly variation. You don’t need an average. There is virtually no human development or urban heat sink involved over the eleven day movement of the air one third of the way around the earth.
In this pure case we find no change in the snowpack over 130 years. We find no bullshit 'climate change' in the variance over that period.
Global warming and climate change are simply fictional. This is a pure case. People who cannot grasp this fact have either hysteria, ideological blindness or an inability to comprehend simple statistics.