What is that question in the title and what the dickens is that answer in the first line?
The NYTimes and its lapdogs have persistently written about the Tea Party 'anger'.
Those of us who do not have lefty
ideological blinders on know that the angry political groups are in the peace movement, in the hate
Bush cocktail circuit, among the hate Palin feminists and in the hate-Jews-pro-Palestinian movement. The
Tea Party is not a political group or ideology it is an immanent American uprising that is calm, determined, grass roots and deliberative.
Anger in the public mood doesn't have staying power. Which is why the NYTimes and its lapdogs would love to believe that the Tea Party is really just a bunch of angry people in a fleeting political mood.
Fortunately for all of us, the Tea Party is not a bunch of angry people in a mood. It is a deeply American force that elected Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and threw up a dingbat (Perot) against two bad choices in the 1992 election and has completely ignored the NYTimes and lapdogs for over forty years.
The real test will be November 2 of this year. The Tea Party will be nearly 18 months old in its current incarnation. It appears to have learned from 1992, when it was registered in 50 states, and now rejects self-chosen leaders. We will see a major rejection of the Obama, Reid, Pelosi train to oblivion.
Anger in the public mood never lasts. The Tea Party is not about an angry political mood.