I had an experience that has parallels to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution.
What is so stunning in retrospect is
the comity. We always had a seventh member, Elijah, an interesting
invited guest, who, for the first year, was given the power to spend
money (that power was revoked after it was abused). There were many
shades of political persuasion in the room: a professional
environmentalist, a Marxist, Stewart Brand, me a Republican banker, a
leader of the computer explosion and our version of George Washington,
the moderator.
I
think the early comity was the result of two things: we knew we were in
the middle of a revolution to build a better world based on cooperation
and good will (basic hippy principles). We also accepted full
responsibility and serious commitment to our work and for our behavior.
That
is what makes me think of the smoldering hot Summer of 1787 in
Philadelphia, with the shades drawn and 39 men, the finest men in the 13
colonies, struggled, compromised and argued to create the U.S.
Constitution, the most powerful document of modern times. They had the
sense of their time being a key point in a revolution and they had a
personal sense of responsibility. There was comity there.
Fifteen years later virtually none of the founding fathers could speak to one another.