This blog space originally dealt
with my role in the creation of the current SEC executive compensation
reporting requirements. I played a central role.
I
circulated the original blog, for this space, to others involved in the
matter and got a strong reaction...basically 'don't publish that.'
The reason has to do with necessary and sufficient. This has happened
to me several times before. I was the primary creator of the modern
universal credit card.
That statement "I was the primary
creator..." is based on my necessary but not sufficient role. There is
no way to tell what would have happened historically if I hadn't walked
into that room at Wells
Fargo Headquarters, in 1966, where three of my
peers were laughing at the stupidity of a recent credit card proposal.
I had the unique knowledge of how Bankamericard worked, its inside financials, and I had single-handedly
done all the marketing research on that subject. I was also credible
to my friends. I was necessary, but they were sufficient in both
timing, corporate rank and knowledge to push the project ahead.
The
New York Times over the past 35 years has published several obituaries
giving other bankers credit for the creation of the modern universal
credit card. In reality, not one of them played a meaningful or
significant role. I have recorded the actual history and given due
credit to the other men who created the modern credit card. Men who
were the sufficient cause of the modern credit card and all of whom
testified to my "necessary" singular and central role.
The same is true for
my role in creating the current reporting rules for executive
compensation. I was the primary agent in creating these new reports, I
was the necessary provocateur, but I was not sufficient. Other people
were essential at the precise time and place for everything to fall
together. The others deserve recognition and appreciation. Unfortunately, this is an ongoing story and to tell it now, would adversely affect the outcome.