If you have skills in international law and have an anti-terrorist bent, there is a lawsuit with your name on it.
The Washington Post reports the following about a new pro-terrorist conference at Georgetown University:
“In 2005 the university's conference center refused to host an anti-terrorism conference sponsored by America's Truth Forum on the grounds that it was "too controversial." So why is free speech and expression of cardinal importance now? Perhaps it is related to the recent $20 million donation from Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal, a prominent financier of the families of Palestinian suicide bombers.”
Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal (Wali Ali to his friends) has the deepest pockets a law firm will ever find. If the Washington Post says he funds terrorists in Palestine, then there are many victims of Palestinian terrorists and their relatives living in the U.S.
Get those plaintiffs and sue Wali Ali. Empty his deep pockets and get luxury hotels and DisneyLand France for your very own.
Is suing an Arab potentate a bad precedent for commerce? No! Neither the Saudis nor anyone else has a large enough market to invest in without the U.S. If the choice is no more investments in the U.S. or in U.S companies versus no more funding of terrorists…nearly all the Arab potentates will stop supporting terrorists.
Which raises a deeper question. Since the world of industrial commerce began several centuries ago, where has the Arab world been?
Are the millennia of hating their neighbors, centuries of hating the Turks, one century of hating the British, a few decades of hating Jews and the recent hatred of Americans part of a pattern? Is the pattern one of spending their Arab lifetimes filled with so much hate they don’t have anything else to do with their lives? Just asking.